MEDIA CONTACT
NEWS RELEASES
CASE STUDIES
NEWSLETTERS
MARKETING MATERIALS
RESOURCES
SEMINARS
 
 
Case Study: Cost Segregation Study
 
 

Printable Version

Back to Case Study Home

Growing Company Looks for Ways to Reduce Income Taxes

Scenario

This CB&H client manufactures and installs display store fixtures throughout the United States. Major customers include some of the leading “big box” retailers in the country.

The client experienced rapid growth during 1999 and 2000 and found itself with an income tax liability of more than $500,000 for the year 2000. The company’s borrowing capacity was maximized. In filing tax returns in September 2001, the client was forced to file with partial payment. The economy took a downturn in 2001 and several customers slowed expansion and additions of new stores. It was apparent by September that the company would have to post a loss for 2001.

Also during 2001, the stockholder completed construction of a new $2.25 million office, manufacturing and distribution facility, with over 12,000 square feet of office space and 60,000 square feet of warehouse and manufacturing space.

CB&H Action Steps

The CB&H Cost Segregation team talked to the client about a cost segregation study when building construction began and upon completion, prepared an estimate to show the client the benefits of a study. A CB&H senior manager in the Cost Segregation group and our engineering alliance firm visited the client at the new building and to complete the free preliminary analysis.

CB&H conducted the estimate of the building costs that qualified as 7 and 15-year depreciable property rather than 39-year. CB&H estimated that more than $660,000 of the total costs of the $2.25 million qualified, resulting in a net present value (NPV) tax savings estimate of almost $100,000.

Since the client had no current taxable income, the first year savings would result from carrying back the loss to the 2000 tax year and recouping some of those paid taxes.

Results

The CB&H Cost Segregation team was engaged to conduct a full study and resulting tax savings were greater than initially anticipated. CB&H increased the net operating tax loss of the company in 2001, saving the client $20,000 in taxes. The company turned things around in 2002, generating taxable income, and the tax savings for 2002 were $32,000. CB&H anticipates that these savings will continue for several years.

The real benefit of a study is the NPV of tax savings generated by speeding up the depreciation expense. A tax dollar saved today is worth more than that tax dollar saved in the future.

 

Privacy Statement  •   Disclaimer
Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P.
Copyright © 2004-2008. All Rights Reserved.