CPAs and Advisors with Your Growth in Mind

AICPA Committee Proposes Interpretation for Long Association

As part of its convergence project with the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants’ (“AICPA”) Professional Ethics Executive Committee has released the exposure draft, Proposed Interpretation –Long Association of Senior Personnel With an Attest Client). The proposal concerns independence threats when an attest client has a long association with senior personnel. The Committee’s proposed Interpretation would state that an AICPA member’s lengthy inclusion among the attest engagement team’s senior personnel could cause a familiarity threat with the attest client. The familiarity threat could also extend to the team’s operations, senior management of the. Read More.

Topics: , , , ,

Comment Period for AICPA Ethics Board Proposal Ends Friday

Tomorrow is the last day to comment on an Exposure Draft by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants’ (“AICPA”) Professional Ethics Executive Committee. The Exposure Draft, Proposed Interpretations — Responding to Non-Compliance with Laws and Regulations, introduces new interpretations of the AICPA Code of Processional Conduct. The proposed new interpretations are entitled “Responding to Non-Compliance with Laws and Regulations” (ET sec. 1.170.010 and 2.170.010) under the “Integrity and Objectivity Rule” (ET sec. 1.100.001 and 2.100.001), and will impact members in public practice and business. The new interpretations offer guidance on a member’s responsibilities when handling non-compliance with regulations at. Read More.

Topics: , , , ,

AICPA Ethics Board Issues Exposure Draft on Legal Non-Compliance

The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants’ (“AICPA”) Professional Ethics Executive Committee has proposed new interpretations concerning the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct. The two proposed interpretations are part of the Exposure Draft, Responding to Non-Compliance with Laws and Regulations , and impacts members in both public practice and business. Entitled “Responding to Non-Compliance with Laws and Regulations” under the “Integrity and Objectivity Rule”, the proposed interpretations offer guidance on a member’s responsibilities when handling non-compliance with regulations at a client or in his or her employing organization. Members that encounter non-compliance must either: Allow the client’s or employing company’s oversight and those with the authority to resolve the. Read More.

Topics: , , , , ,