Banks and Trade Groups Want More Time to Implement FASB Credit Loss Standard
A few months have passed since bank regulators introduced a proposal to alleviate the regulatory capital impact of the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) credit loss standard. Several banks and trade groups, however, believe more time is needed to examine the effects of Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments — Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. In comment letters to regulators, individual banks and trade groups propose extending the phase-in period of the standard from three years to five years. Representatives from groups like the Independent Community Bankers of America said that the. Read More.
AICPA and Credit Union Advocate Seek New Credit Loss Standard Effective Date
Despite non-public entities already receiving an extra year to comply with the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) new credit loss standard, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (“AICPA”) and the Credit Union National Association (“CUNA”) seek another extension. Both organizations want the FASB to amend the effective date of Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments — Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, as well as give privately held banks and credit unions until January 1, 2022, to implement the guidance. Non-public businesses like private community banks and credit unions must apply the new. Read More.
Topics: Accounting Standards Update "ASU", AICPA, Community Banks, Credit Loss Model "CECL", Credit Union National Association, Credit Unions, FASB, FASB credit loss standard, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326)
Smaller Banks Can Avoid Using Complex Models in Calculating Loss Reserves
Community bankers could be exempt from using the complex models necessary to comply with the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) credit loss standard. Banking regulators said that the current expected credit loss model under Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments — Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, is flexible enough that smaller lending institutions are not required to purchase expensive software or use complex modeling techniques to meet the standard’s provisions for calculating loss reserves. During a February 27 webcast, the Federal Reserve’s Joanne Wakim stated that small banks could calculate loss reserves. Read More.
Senate Bill Gives Sarbanes-Oxley Exemption to Small Banks
Banks holding less than $1 billion in assets could receive an exemption from the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404(b) under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Under S. 1962, the Community Bank Access to Capital Act of 2017, the proposed Senate bill frees smaller banks from the more complicated and expensive reforms under Sarbanes-Oxley. S. 1962 also requires public companies to hire an external auditor to attest to management’s internal controls over financial reporting. The bill’s co-sponsor, Senator Mike Rounds (R-S.D.), stated the proposed measure would promote growth among community banks and help them support their communities. Section 404(b) advocates. Read More.