DoD Inspector General Issues Two Reports on DCAA Quality Control
On August 27, 2014, the Defense Contract Audit Agency (“DCAA”) issued Memorandum for Regional Directors (MRD) 14-PAS-014(R) , captioned ”Audit Guidance on Removal of Modified GAGAS Statement in Audit Reports”. As background for this MRD, Generally Accepted Government Auditing Standards (GAGAS) require audit organizations to obtain an external peer review at least once every three years. For DCAA, the external reviews are performed by the Department of Defense’s (“DoD”) Inspector General. In August 2009, the Inspector General revoked its previous approval of DCAA’s quality control program. As a consequence, since August 2009, DCAA has been unable to state that it performed its audits in accordance with. Read More.
Unbilled Accounts Receivable: Real or Imagined Assets?
Unbilled accounts receivable (A/R) represents recorded revenue that has not yet been billed on a contract. There can be many different reasons for having unbilled A/R recorded on the balance sheet (B/S). Government contractors with cost reimbursable contracts tend to have greater unbilled accounts that stay on the B/S longer. The most common reasons for unbilled A/R are the following: Timing differences: These can exist due to the normal timeframe of processing employee timesheets and invoices through the accounting system. These amounts should be billed as soon as possible in accordance with contractual terms. Rate variances: These can exist when. Read More.
DCAA Issues Guidance on Dealing with Delinquent Final Indirect Cost Rate Proposals
On February 3, 2014, the Defense Contract Audit Agency (“DCAA”) issued Memorandum for Regional Directors (MRD) 14-PPD-002(R), entitled, Treatment of Delinquent Final Indirect Rate Proposals. As indicated by the title, the guidance addresses steps DCAA and the Defense Contract Management Agency (“DCMA”) will take when a contractor does not submit its final indirect cost rate proposal on time. Before discussing the MRD, some background information on submission of final indirect cost rate proposals is in order. Contrary to the belief of some DCAA auditors, contractors do not have an inherent duty to establish final indirect cost rates. Instead, contractors are. Read More.
Topics: Allowable Cost and Payment, Audit, Defense Contract Audit Agency "DCAA", Defense Contract Management Agency "DCMA", Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement, Federal Acquisition Regulation "FAR", Government Contracting, Indirect Cost Rates, Memorandum for Regional Directors "MRD"
DCAA Issues new Guidance on Establishment of Provisional Billing Rates
On June 27, 2014, the Defense Contract Audit Agency (“DCAA”) issued Memorandum for Regional Directors (“MRD”) 14-PPS-012(R) Guidance on Establishing Provisional Billing Rates . The new guidance is effective October 1, 2014, but early implementation is encouraged. This new guidance should help to ease issues that have arisen between DCAA and contractors regarding a contractor’s obligation to submit a proposal to establish billing rates. In the past, some of our clients have had DCAA auditors cite them for having deficient accounting systems because the contractor did not submit a “timely” proposal to establish billing rates. This was inappropriate because there is no specific requirement in the FAR for a contractor to submit. Read More.
Changes to ALL Compensation for Government Contractors
As part of the 2013 Bipartisan Budget Act, Congress reduced the contractor and subcontractor compensation cap from $952,308 to $487,000, a 49 percent reduction. The cap will be adjusted annually to reflect the change in the Employment Cost Index for all workers as calculated by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. As always, contractors can pay whatever amounts they deem appropriate, but the government will only reimburse (at the most) to the cap. Previously, Congress, in the 2012 National Defense Authorization Act, applied the ceiling on reimbursable pay to all Department of Defense (“DoD”), Coast Guard, and National Aeronautics and Space. Read More.
Topics: 2012 National Defense Authorization Act, 2013 Bipartisan Budget Act, Administrator of NASA, Administrator of the General Services Administration, Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals "ASBCA", Bureau of Labor Statistics, Coast Guard, Compensation, Congress, Contractor, Defense Contract Audit Agency "DCAA", Department of Defense "DoD", Employment Cost Index, Federal Acquisition Regulation "FAR", Government Contractors, GSA, National Aeronautics and Space Administration "NASA", Secretary of Defense, subcontractor, United States Court of Federal Claims, Veterans Administration "VA"
Defense Contract Audit Agency Issues Guidance on Professional and Consulting Costs
The Defense Contract Audit Agency (“DCAA”) recently released a Memorandum for Regional Directors entitled, “ Audit Alert on Professional and Consultant Service Costs (FAR 31.205-33) and Purchased Labor ”. The intent of the memorandum is to ensure that auditors are testing the transaction based on the nature of the claimed cost, and not on the account nomenclature in which the contractor recorded the cost. Federal Acquisition Regulation (“FAR”) 31.205-33(a) defines professional and consulting services costs as services rendered by persons who are members of a particular profession, or possess a special skill, and who are not officers or employees of the contractor. Examples include those services acquired by contractors to enhance their legal,. Read More.