House Bill Includes Insider Trading Plan Study
News of Rep. Chris Collins’ (R-N.Y.) recent indictment for insider trading has brought attention to a little-known provision in the JOBS and Investor Confidence Act of 2018. Passing through the House of Representatives last month, the bill dubbed “JOBS Act 3.0” features a measure requiring the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to study insider trading plans administered by Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act. Such plans let company insiders trade stock on a fixed schedule and avoid liability from insider trading. The study includes examining the new restrictions to Rule 10b5-1, such as when an issuer can implement a 10b5-1 plan. Currently, Rule 10b5-1 offers an organized approach. Read More.
Civil Monetary Penalties Adjusted for Inflation
A final rule has been introduced to carry out the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015. The final rule implements the first annual inflation adjustment of Securities and Exchange Commission-issued (“SEC”) civil monetary penalties under the following: Securities Act of 1933 Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Investment Company Act of 1940 Investment Advisers Act of 1940 Certain penalties under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Violations that occurred after November 2, 2015, will be impacted upon the final rule’s effective date. For violations on or before that date, the SEC will reinstate penalty amounts in its previous adjustments as. Read More.
Topics: Civil Monetary Penalties, Debt Collection Improvement Act, Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act, Investment Advisers Act of 1940, Investment Company Act of 1940, Sarbanes-Oxley Act "SOX", Securities Act of 1933, Securities and Exchange Commission "SEC", Securities Exchange Act of 1934
GATE Global Impact Petitions for Change to Anti-Fraud Rule
Last month, GATE Global Impact Inc., filed a rulemaking petition asking the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to amend Rule 15c2-11 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The New York-based electronic marketplace says the decades-old rule against microcap fraud must be changed to account for what it believes to be an unintentional consequence of the JOBS Act. Per its petition, GATE predicted that SEC adoption of the JOBS Act’s “Regulation A+” capital formation rules would increase the number of securities bound by Rule 15c2-11. Without making changes to the “piggyback” exception to Rule 15c2-11, GATE insisted that the rise. Read More.